- From: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:19:17 -0400
- To: Richard Wallis <richard.wallis@dataliberate.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>, "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAOr1obEaicXW=wJgCEOrA2mj=Tnh3OxTa5yBf2CZcrC_54GMCw@mail.gmail.com>
I also realize that I somehow closed my own pull request to add locationCreated <https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/323> instead of merging it into sdo-ganymede. Unless folks object, I'll resubmit for sdo-phobos. - Vicki Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 5:30 AM, Richard Wallis < richard.wallis@dataliberate.com> wrote: > wordCount: +1 > > #764 - discussion evolving on issue - I've just proposed an offeredBy > property for Offer > > #445 - I lean towards, at this stage, starting with a simplistic > (ExhibitionEvent) that can be built upon over time, and also a simple > super-property for workPerformed, workPresented, (such as workFeatured ?) > with its sub properties being added to the relevant Event subtypes. > > > > Richard Wallis > Founder, Data Liberate > http://dataliberate.com > Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/richardwallis > Twitter: @rjw > > On 15 September 2015 at 20:45, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: > >> On 15 September 2015 at 20:34, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> >> wrote: >> > Adding wordCount to Book (or even CreativeWork) seems like an easy one. >> > (https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/622) >> > >> > Some discussions seem to have simply died after the initial question was >> > answered. We should come up with a policy for closing these issues after >> > they have been dormant for some period of time. >> >> Yes - issues that get closed generally have someone championing them. >> We have a lot of plates spinning... Often (as below) there are a few >> rough edges that need final attention, rather than a complete polished >> yes-or-no design. We might do well to break out sub-issues in such >> situations, rather than have a single gigantic issue thread. >> >> I like the idea of adding wordCount. >> >> Another bibliographic one: >> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/764 - this is an idea >> for making it possible to describe not-for-profit offers such as >> library holdings / lending, without needing to phrase it as a >> 'seller'. Martin Hepp, Dan Scott, everyone - any views on this? >> >> https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/445 on adding >> ExhibitionEvent was looking promising - but there are a few details, >> e.g. how to link the works in an exhibition. We already have >> workPerformed (for music), workPresented (for movies at a >> ScreeningEvent) - can we generalise this to featuredEvent (an Event >> and the CreativeWorks(s) it features), rather than adding yet another >> specific case e.g. workExhibited? >> >> Dan >> >> > - Vicki >> > >> > >> > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Schema.org CG, >> >> >> >> Our last release was just over a month ago, >> >> http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v2.1 >> >> >> >> It would be great to wrap up another release in the next week or two. >> >> >> >> There is a draft based on the Github sdo-phobos branch available for >> >> review at >> >> >> >> http://sdo-phobos.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-phobos >> >> >> >> Please take a look at what's there, but also at any other open issues >> >> that are reaching something approximating consensus and might be easy >> >> to finalize and include without a huge amount more discussion. As >> >> always the open issues list is at >> >> http://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues ... >> >> >> >> cheers, >> >> >> >> Dan >> >> >> > >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2015 17:19:45 UTC