- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 20:45:22 +0100
- To: Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com>, Martin Hepp <mfhepp@gmail.com>, Dan Scott <dan@coffeecode.net>
- Cc: "schema.org Mailing List" <public-schemaorg@w3.org>
On 15 September 2015 at 20:34, Vicki Tardif Holland <vtardif@google.com> wrote: > Adding wordCount to Book (or even CreativeWork) seems like an easy one. > (https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/622) > > Some discussions seem to have simply died after the initial question was > answered. We should come up with a policy for closing these issues after > they have been dormant for some period of time. Yes - issues that get closed generally have someone championing them. We have a lot of plates spinning... Often (as below) there are a few rough edges that need final attention, rather than a complete polished yes-or-no design. We might do well to break out sub-issues in such situations, rather than have a single gigantic issue thread. I like the idea of adding wordCount. Another bibliographic one: https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/764 - this is an idea for making it possible to describe not-for-profit offers such as library holdings / lending, without needing to phrase it as a 'seller'. Martin Hepp, Dan Scott, everyone - any views on this? https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/445 on adding ExhibitionEvent was looking promising - but there are a few details, e.g. how to link the works in an exhibition. We already have workPerformed (for music), workPresented (for movies at a ScreeningEvent) - can we generalise this to featuredEvent (an Event and the CreativeWorks(s) it features), rather than adding yet another specific case e.g. workExhibited? Dan > - Vicki > > > Vicki Tardif Holland | Ontologist | vtardif@google.com > > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Dan Brickley <danbri@google.com> wrote: >> >> Schema.org CG, >> >> Our last release was just over a month ago, >> http://schema.org/docs/releases.html#v2.1 >> >> It would be great to wrap up another release in the next week or two. >> >> There is a draft based on the Github sdo-phobos branch available for >> review at >> >> http://sdo-phobos.appspot.com/docs/releases.html#sdo-phobos >> >> Please take a look at what's there, but also at any other open issues >> that are reaching something approximating consensus and might be easy >> to finalize and include without a huge amount more discussion. As >> always the open issues list is at >> http://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues ... >> >> cheers, >> >> Dan >> >
Received on Tuesday, 15 September 2015 19:45:51 UTC