- From: Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:25:22 -0400
- To: "Antoine Isaac" <aisaac@few.vu.nl>
- Cc: <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
The thing I like about UNIMARC Authorities is that they have the notion of a "primary entity" which is the thing the record represents. If you look in the same places in MARC21 Authorities you'll find a tautology. :-/ Sent from my iPad On Mar 24, 2013, at 7:58 AM, "Antoine Isaac" <aisaac@few.vu.nl> wrote: > Not sure I prefer these ones... > > PS: "record", really? Did your glasses contain MARC brandy? ;-) (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_%28eau-de-vie%29) > > >> I described the general situation to my wife and she suggested the alternative: "oneOf". Hmm. >> >> After a few more drinks, we finally agreed on "isRecordOf". ;-) >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >> On Mar 22, 2013, at 8:26 AM, "Wallis,Richard"<Richard.Wallis@oclc.org> wrote: >> >>> I have renamed the Work-Instance proposal to a more generic CreativeWork Relationships<http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/CreativeWork_Relationships> to remove the associations with those words in FRBR, BIBFRAME etc. >>> >>> In yesterday's meeting we suggested that instanceOf& hasInstance should be renamed to derivativeOf& hasDerivative. However discussion on list has moved away from that idea so I have left it as is for the moment. >>> >>> I suggest we try some more examples and look at the wording. >>> >>> I think we have general agreement about the need for these properties. It is the names we need to settle, and appropriate examples to test them against and use for explanation in the proposal. >>> >>> ~Richard >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 12:26:26 UTC