- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:10:01 -0700
- To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
Yes, Antoine, very much agreed. I think that we simply want to know if we have the option of changing such a definition so that it is not limited to "sell." If the consensus of the public-vocab list is that it's too late to make such a change, then we know we need to take a different approach. I'll suggest: "An offer to sell a product, provide a service, or make an exchange between parties." kc On 7/17/13 3:32 PM, Antoine Isaac wrote: > Hi Karen, > > >> I'm listening to the meeting recording (it's amazing how much more it >> makes sense the second time around!). Antoine made a good proposal >> about asking the general vocab list about the possibility of modifying >> definitions of properties like "offer". Right now, this is the >> definition for offer: >> >> "An offer to sell an item—for example, an offer to sell a product, the >> DVD of a movie, or tickets to an event." >> >> I think we could describe our case for using offer and ask about the >> community's feeling about making the definition a bit more general. >> > > > Yes, but as said in the call I'd insist on not describing the case > entirely (i.e, with 150 different attributes, FRBR chains, what have you > not...). Just making the point for motivating that there are 'free > offers' that we'd like to represent using the schema.org/Offer class. > Otherwise the WebSchema guys won't even care reading the email (and > rightfully so). > > Cheers, > > Antoine > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net ph: 1-510-540-7596 m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2013 01:10:36 UTC