RE: prevalence of schema.org/Book

>>> On 25.1.2013 at 21:25, "Young,Jeff (OR)" <jyoung@oclc.org> wrote: 
>
> Schema.org does have an OWL ontology, so it should be possible to see
> how they've justified the same property in multiple classes.
> 
> http://www.schema.org/docs/datamodel.html
> 
> Assuming they take OWL seriously,

I do NOT think that OWL is taken seriously yet at schema.org. Thus, we should not take it as a reference to answer such questions.

- Adrian

Received on Monday, 28 January 2013 09:14:30 UTC