Re: Content-Carrier Proposal

Especially since many audiobooks are abridged versions and thus unique
instances.


On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net> wrote:

> I'm fine with tossing in a whole list of "types", but I don't see what
> this has to do with content/carrier if it can contain both. So maybe what
> we're talking about here, instead, is a more general "format"? And it would
> include "book" "picture book" "large print" "MP3" "movie" "BlueRay"
> "Operetta" "Map" and whatever else? If so, I would rename the page to
> reflect that.
>
> Also, audio book is going to need some very specific data elements that we
> don't have yet in schema.org. So I still maintain that audiobook is its
> own thing, not just an additional format on metadata for a book.
>
> kc
>
>

-- 
Tod Robbins
Digital Collections Librarian, MLIS
todrobbins.com | @todrobbins <http://www.twitter.com/#!/todrobbins>