Re: Schema Markup Documents ie: .bot files

HTML should allow for an array of ontologies to be used.  Schemaorg is
needed for search discovery. Others are required for a variety of different
purposes.

To decentralized, It would be good to change the way the document is
presented based on the client.

Its of course important to ensure a page is available to search. But I
don't think it's important to ensure all the ontology (linguistics) is
embedded in schemaorg.

Tim.h.

On Tue., 4 Oct. 2016, 8:41 pm Jonas Smedegaard, <dr@jones.dk> wrote:

> Quoting Timothy Holborn (2016-10-04 11:19:47)
> > Had an idea.
> >
> > The idea relates to the various ontology mark-up currently placed in-line
> > with a HTML document.  Problem is various agents want different formats /
> > different ontologies.
> >
> > So,
> >
> > HTML5 currently has a
> >
> > .HTML
> > .js
> > .css
> >
> > the suggestion is to add a .bot file (or other name - as that's not
> > consequential)
> >
> > The intention is to improve support for schema by identifying what the
> > client is, much like the means CSS improves user-experience for 'style'.
> >
> > In this way, if the 'agent' is FB - then OG tags; or search providers =
> > schemaorg, etc.
> >
> > The external file would need to be linked to tags in the HTML doc;
> allowing
> > it to be flexibly parsed using various schema markup to suit different
> > agents.
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Problem is, as I see it, that ontologies like schema.org are designed
> for a specific purpose.
>
> Seems backwards to me to support segmentation of communication like
> that: HTML was invented as a means to _unify_ the needs for exchanging
> documents, and RDF to do the same for data more generally.  Your idea
> seems to try go the opposite direction and encourage single-purpose
> sub-languages of RDF.
>
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>