- From: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 02:30:01 +1000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Cc: cr <_@whats-your.name>, public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <D65D5581-25E3-40E0-AE05-5FC863F1C736@gmail.com>
Typo on webize page/link.. See below Timh Sent from my iPad > On 28 Apr 2014, at 2:24 am, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> On 27 April 2014 17:50, cr <_@whats-your.name> wrote: >> some people like to write text on mailinglists, others code.. >> >> https://github.com/linkeddata/ldphp/blob/master/www/inc/class/WAC.php >> >> am curious what constitutes the "essence" of WAC and what is implementation-specific. >> >> "going recursive" up parent paths.. we well know URIs in RDF are opaque yet URIs have a hierarchical-part and those might be mapped to POSIX paths - where ldphp may have exited on an explicit allow, POSIX might have denied a similar situation due to a mode 700 several parents up. >> >> there's the nod to "root" with the "domain owner".. >> >> LDP Containers and container-level permissions could be an optimization to avoid running 50*3 SPARQL queries, providing all 50 resources are within a container.. chances are any container-hierarchical-permission-inheritance stuff is defined in WAC at a LDP level and not POSIX dir level anyways.. > > Very good points ... > > So according to timbl's webize note [1] > > unix file system -> ACL'd r/w linked data. --> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CloiudStorage.html. Rather than http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/CloudStorage.html > With the typical user,group,owner actors having read,write,execute permissions (tho we have the very useful append too) > > Most people forget about the 4th dimension of POSIX which is the the setuid, setgui, sticky bit permissions > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Setuid > > I dont use these much but they I think are about executing "as" a user or group. So maybe this could be some kind of solution to delegated access / secretaries. > > Might be a good time to refresh where we are on this issue, and collect implementations. I'll be happy to update the wiki, if so ... > > [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Webize.html > >> >> any other implementations to look at? Stample's Scala is going to take a bit for me to get me head around its wizard-levels of abstraction >
Received on Sunday, 27 April 2014 16:30:35 UTC