Re: rdf delta

On 4 May 2013 11:12, Jürgen Jakobitsch SWC <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>wrote:

> fyi
>
> http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Diff.html
>
> wkr jürgen
>

Some other options here:

1. David Wood has suggested "I suggest yes.  However, they should probably
become a separate Note or Rec in parallel.)
2. Ashok has said, "I could see if we need to develop a complex patch
document format that we should discuss the best way to make that happen as
it may be too much for our WG as-is."
3. TurtlePatch has been referred to (see
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/TurtlePatch), but this document appears to
be exactly as it claims: just "a sketch" of a spec. It raises the the
notion of a need - that's about it.
4. The Talis ChangeSets have also been referenced and this is the most
thorough set of examples of real-world useful stuff I could find. Could be
a good starting point, indeed.
5. Very little of the history of ISSUE-17 makes useful contribution in such
that it looks like something concrete and agreeable even started to come
out of it. Almost half the history, in fact, spins off into a discussion
about something else entirely. So, unless Sandro's got something surprising
in the oven, we've cooked up very little at all.
6. Some personal notes from Tim-BL on RDF diff (a little dated, perhaps,
but interesting): http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Diff
7. RFC5789 for HTTP PATCH, states:

Taken from the LDP mailing list


>
> --
> | Jürgen Jakobitsch,
> | Software Developer
> | Semantic Web Company GmbH
> | Mariahilfer Straße 70 / Neubaugasse 1, Top 8
> | A - 1070 Wien, Austria
> | Mob +43 676 62 12 710 | Fax +43.1.402 12 35 - 22
>
> COMPANY INFORMATION
> | web       : http://www.semantic-web.at/
> | foaf      : http://company.semantic-web.at/person/juergen_jakobitsch
> PERSONAL INFORMATION
> | web       : http://www.turnguard.com
> | foaf      : http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard
> | g+        : https://plus.google.com/111233759991616358206/posts
> | skype     : jakobitsch-punkt
> | xmlns:tg  = "http://www.turnguard.com/turnguard#"
>
>
>