W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Adding an app to a profile

From: ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 19:50:35 +0000
To: nathan <nathan@webr3.org>
Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1354131575-sup-5763@heahdk.net>
Excerpts from Nathan's message of 2012-11-28 19:28:06 +0000:
> ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ wrote:
> > Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-28 18:13:19 +0000:
> >> On 11/28/12 12:36 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 28 November 2012 18:32, Nathan <nathan@webr3.org 
> >>> <mailto:nathan@webr3.org>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> >>>
> >>>         Part of the RWW is a clean separation between apps, data and
> >>>         identiry.
> >>>
> >>>         I was wondering if there's a convenient single predicate to
> >>>         add a webapp to
> >>>         a profile page.
> >>>
> >>>         Currently I use foaf : interest which isnt really accurate.
> >>>
> >>>         We were thinking about creating
> >>>
> >>>         plink : webapp
> >>>
> >>>         As per http://ontologi.es/
> >>>
> >>>         Any thoughts on this?
> >>>
> >>>         I think it would be awesome when we can finally start adding
> >>>         apps to our
> >>>         pages.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Somehow I don't follow lol, why would we link from our foaf to an
> >>>     app? and in what capacity?
> >>>
> >>>     - saying "I created/contribute to this app"
> >>>     - saying "this is my account on website/app x" (eg this is my twitter)
> >>>     - something else?
> >>>
> >>>     (generally I'd thought we'd link to our data, and then different
> >>>     apps of a users preference would consume/display that data)
> >>>
> >>>     Apologies for the confusing, I think I'm just missing a little
> >>>     context somwhere :D
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It's similar to when you add an app to facebook or google plus.  Then 
> >>> you get a link in your sidebar of your profile to say, your calendar, 
> >>> tasks, etc.
> >>>
> >>> Also then other people can see what apps you use
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Nath
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Yes, so you have "use" as the verb in the sentence: I use X . Thus, you 
> >> can just start with a Turtle file that states:
> >>
> >> # start
> >>
> >> <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>.
> >>
> >> #if you find a preferred predicate from a shared vocabulary or ontology, 
> >> you can just add:
> >> <#use> rdfs:subPropertyOf <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> .
> >>
> >> # OR
> >>
> >> <#use> owl:equivalentProperty <NewlyDiscoveredPredictateURI> .
> >>
> >> # end
> >>
> >> It just depends on what you are trying to say, don't be distracted by 
> >> the search for a perfect predicate from a shared vocabulary etc..
> > thanks for this tip!
> > 
> > how does it work later on when i start writing queries?
> 
> Inference is quite simple.
> 
> If you have <a> <b> <c> . and <b> sameAs <d> . then most decent 
> engines/stores will add the inferred triple <a> <d> <c> to the dataset, 
> so your query works whether you've used <b> or <d> :)
thanks for clarifying!

so things can get tricky if given technology doesn't support inference, like for example currently rdfstore-js
https://github.com/antoniogarrote/rdfstore-js
Received on Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:51:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 28 November 2012 19:51:05 GMT