W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: WAC w/ content-negotiation

From: Dominik Tomaszuk <ddooss@wp.pl>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 11:01:31 +0100
Message-ID: <509399FB.5060905@wp.pl>
To: public-rww@w3.org
On 02.11.2012 02:18, Andrei Sambra wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 11:00 PM, Nathan wrote:
>> Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>>> On 11/1/12 2:07 PM, Joe Presbrey wrote:
>>>> Here's a sample rule from the wiki:
>>>>
>>>> [acl:accessTo <card.rdf>; acl:mode acl:Read, acl:agentClass
>>>> foaf:Agent].
>>>>
>>>> Quick question with regard to acl:accessTo <card.rdf>:
>>>>
>>>> Many LD servers I see also serve the same graph at <card.ttl>,
>>>> <card.json>, <card?format=json>, and/or <card> (w/ Accept: */format).
>>>>
>>>> We can't expect users to enumerate all these in their rules. Does
>>>> anyone have an example implementation of one of these kinds of
>>>> servers?
>>>>
>>>> Should we drop the type suffix (.rdf) from the wiki examples? eg. the
>>>> rule should be simply acl:accessTo <card>, and apply to all content
>>>> negotiations for the same graph.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> Likewise +1.
>>
>> Also, which link relation are we using to expose where the acl is (so it
>> can also be edited over rww?
>>
>
> +1 as well.
Same as above +1

Dominik
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 10:02:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 2 November 2012 10:02:31 GMT