Re: Pingback changes/improvements

I am back in France, so I'll have time to look at this and
other things more closely soon.

I think it would be nice if we could publish 
  https://resourceme.bergnet.org/spec-pingback
 and an updated version of
  http://bblfish.net/tmp/2011/05/09/
on read-write-web community group space.

 I also think it would be useful to update it with the 
Linked Data Basic Profile 1.0 in mind,

  http://www.w3.org/Submission/2012/02/

though I think one should wait for the new working group
to come to some conclusions there.

Henry

On 12 May 2012, at 16:20, bergi wrote:

> My ResourceMe managed WebID profile [1] finally supports Pingback. I've
> implemented it slightly different than the spec defines currently. The
> reason for this was lack of covering the endpoint authentication use
> case. Authentication is very important, also in the early stages,
> otherwise people may compare it to SMTP, with all the implicated spam
> and spoofing problems. With WebID we have already an elegant way to
> solve this problem. But also we should have a look at the other
> authentication mechanisms that require a page flow. So here a link to my
> proposed spec changes/improvements [2].
> 
> [1] https://www.bergnet.org/people/bergi/card#me
> [2] https://resourceme.bergnet.org/spec-pingback
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/

Received on Saturday, 12 May 2012 17:46:58 UTC