W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > July 2012

Re: SignedMail

From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:53:26 -0400
Message-ID: <5005B4A6.50800@openlinksw.com>
To: public-rww@w3.org
On 7/17/12 2:39 PM, SWC - Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
> i will :)
>
> am in transition between mail clients.. but some sort of filter in
> zimbra removed mails, so i couldn't answer from evolution...
>
> reading your post, i will move again to virtuoso sometime soon :)

Henceforth, whenever I want to find your WebID I have a choice of lookup 
via my mailbox or LOD cloud :-)


Kingsley
>
> wkr turnguard
>
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 14:31 -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
>> On 7/17/12 2:20 PM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
>>> ok thanks henry...
>>>
>>> i think i can live with that...
>> Waiting for you to send signed emails all the time, including this
>> mailing list :-)
>>
>> Note, the fun has only just begun. S/MIME is step #1. Next step is IMAP4
>> & WebID, I already have this working such that I don't care about SPAM.
>> I advertise my Email everywhere because I just don't worry about Spam. I
>> can use my iPhone, iPad, Android devices wherever, and I have WebID
>> based filter rules (just like the ones for resources ACLs) that organize
>> and tag my mails. I can control all my mail boxes via IMAP4 + WebID
>> based filtering :-)
>>
>> Links:
>>
>> 1. https://plus.google.com/s/spam%20webid%20idehen%20imap4%20ods -- old
>> posts about killing SPAM via WebID .
>>
>> Kingsley
>>> wkr turnguard
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Henry Story" <henry.story@bblfish.net>
>>> To: "Jürgen Jakobitsch" <j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at>
>>> Cc: public-rww@w3.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 8:13:03 PM
>>> Subject: Re: SignedMail
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 19:52, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> hi and thanks,
>>>
>>> this is actually what i was expecting... and hoping to have solved.
>>> could you also send a screenshot of what happens when you open
>>> a mail from kingsley. i'm trying to figure out if there's a difference.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here it is.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems that his e-mail address is listed in the certificate and that the key usage fields are included.
>>> Higher up there is the Trust setting that says "Use System Defaults", but even if I set that to trust always, that does not change the e-mail signature verification problem, though the red the turn to green.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> wkr turnguard
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Henry Story" < henry.story@bblfish.net >
>>> To: "j jakobitsch" < j.jakobitsch@semantic-web.at >
>>> Cc: public-rww@w3.org
>>> Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2012 7:44:01 PM
>>> Subject: Re: SignedMail
>>>
>>>
>>> This is what I get.
>>>
>>>
>>> There is something wrong with the signature it seems.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I later add you by hand to my certificate chain, as your certificate is not signed by a well known CA, so that it would show me that it trusted this came from you.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17 Jul 2012, at 19:27, SWC - Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> the cert for signing this email was created this service [1].
>>> are there any mail clients complaining?
>>>
>>> evolution (mine) says ok (i have the cert installed though).
>>>
>>> any feedback greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> wkr turnguard.com
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://id.myopenlink.net/certgen/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Social Web Architect
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>
>>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen







Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 18:53:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 17 July 2012 18:53:13 GMT