W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Triple Access Control

From: bergi <bergi@axolotlfarm.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:29:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4E712AD2.2000307@axolotlfarm.org>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
CC: public-rww@w3.org
Am 13.09.2011 21:32, schrieb Melvin Carvalho:
>> What do you think about my proposal? Somebody has a different approach?
> Another possible approach:
> use owl : sameAs
> If the agent has access return some triples, if not return FORBIDDEN

How would you handle complex scenarios like G+ in RDF?

One approach could be a resource per circle. But that would mean you
have to duplicate some of your data.

It would be possible to spread your triples in a way that there are no
duplicates, but wouldn't that be more complicated to handle than
describing the rules using the ontology I proposed?

And how do you handle write access? If the data doesn't exist there is
no resource to point to.

Maybe there is a simple solution to the problems I've described, but
currently I mainly see disadvantages.
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2011 22:33:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:39:55 UTC