>If the answer to the first question is: none, couldn't we repair the >draft charter (wrt that issue) by removing section 3.1 and rephrasing >section 2.9 to say that SNAF is in scope and the RIF must offer ways to >specify the scope of NAF. That is, after section 2.3 has been amended to >avoid the contradiction between such a statement and the RIF being full >FOL, of course. This sounds like an excellent proposal! -- dieter ---------------------------------------------------------------- Dieter Fensel, http://www.deri.org/ Tel.: +43-512-5076485/8Received on Thursday, 1 September 2005 11:05:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:23 GMT