> The Semantic Web applications I'm familiar with (including everything > based on cwm, some of my prolog work, and various things I hear about) > all merge rulesets freely by just puting them together (concatenation, > set-union, conjunction, etc). I think this is a very naive approach that only works if your rules are written in a severely restricted language such as RDF or Datalog. > It's trivial with RDF, OWL, N3, and FOL (when you use URIs for names). I don't think it's trivial for OWL and FOL where you could get various kinds of inconsistencies that would have to be resolved, which would lead to nonmonotonicity. This problem is well-known in the KR community, and the prominent topic of belief revision is closely related to this issue of merging rules. -GerdReceived on Monday, 29 August 2005 09:02:01 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:16:23 GMT