W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org > August 2005

Re: A Rule Interchange Format VS a Rule Language for Interoperability and other issues

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:56:14 +0200
Message-ID: <430C7C7E.5020106@ilog.fr>
To: ewallace@cme.nist.gov
CC: public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org

ewallace@cme.nist.gov wrote:
> You wrote:
> ...
>>Now that we are all convinced that the RLI way is the practical way to 
>>go first (you are convinced, aren't you? :-) the nature of the issues 
>>changes slightly:
> Didn't you actually mean, "...convinced that the RIF way is the practical 
> way to go first..."?

Arghhh! Yes, that is what I meant!

The Rule Interchange Format way is the way to go first, that is what I 
believe (unless somebody can convince me to the contrary)! How could I 
possibly write otherwise?

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 11:00:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:33 UTC