W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org > August 2005

Re: Comments on * DRAFT * Rules Working Group Charter $Revision: 1.60 $

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 10:50:45 -0400
To: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: jos.deroo@agfa.com, public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org
Message-Id: <20050824145045.632514EEBA@homer.w3.org>

> At any moment when NAF is computed the set of rules and facts is known to
> the inference engine. What is your problem?

Is NAF useful in rule sets which are combined with unknown,
unrestricted other rule sets (potentially also give true information
about the same domain of discourse) before any inference is done?  If
so, could you give me an example?

     -- sandro
Received on Wednesday, 24 August 2005 14:50:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:33 UTC