Re: Time Vocabulary

Hi,
Peter, thank you for the effort. Monika, could you try to propose an
extension (or alternative) version from DUL? It would help the comparison
and the discussion.

Daniele

Il giorno ven 26 giu 2015 alle ore 11:08 Monika Solanki <
monika.solanki@gmail.com> ha scritto:

>  I still think extending from a foundational ontology such as DUL has its
> purpose and advantages, so besides PROV-O it would also be useful to extend
> from DUL. However, I will leave it at that.
>
>
> Monika
>
>
>
> On 26/06/2015 10:44, Wetz Peter wrote:
>
>  Dear all,
>
>
>
> as discussed extensively on the list (cf. [1]) there is a need to create a
> small time vocabulary (or reuse existing terms) for capturing relations
> between streamed graphs and time instants.
>
>
>
> I have done a first simple proposal and uploaded it to the repo at [2]. I
> reuse properties of PROV-O by specializing from some PROV-O terms. I hope
> you can take a look so we can have a discussion in today’s telco.
>
>
>
> Looking forward!
>
>
>
> Best,
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> [1] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/issues/10
>
> [2] https://github.com/streamreasoning/RSP-QL/blob/master/TimeVocab.owl
>
>
>