Re: CAPTCHA - issue #26

Agreed, Jason. Since IETF has published, I think we can reference their
publication along with our response on this issue as well as the similar
issue #16, where this approach appears to be termed "blinded
verifications."

Janina

White, Jason J writes:
> I think we should carefully look at and take into account the recently opened Issue #26:
> https://github.com/w3c/apa/issues/26
> which refers to standards work of the IETF and to a published paper regarding a privacy-preserving protocol that can be used to limit the presentation of CAPTCHA challenges to users.
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain privileged or confidential information. It is solely for use by the individual for whom it is intended, even if addressed incorrectly. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender; do not disclose, copy, distribute, or take any action in reliance on the contents of this information; and delete it from your system. Any other use of this e-mail is prohibited.
> 
> 
> Thank you for your compliance.
> 
> ________________________________

-- 

Janina Sajka

Linux Foundation Fellow
Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup:	http://a11y.org

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI)
Chair, Accessible Platform Architectures	http://www.w3.org/wai/apa

Received on Friday, 29 March 2019 20:22:08 UTC