Re: state of UCR?

Leora Morgenstern <leora@cs.nyu.edu> wrote:

>
>On Sun, December 9, 2012 7:31 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> On 12/09/2012 07:19 PM, Leora Morgenstern wrote:
>>> Sandro,
>>>
>>> I believe that the edits were reviewed, but it was on my to-do list
>to
>>> check the email archives to confirm this, and I haven't yet done
>that.
>>> If
>>> I can get to that by Wednesday, would that be enough to publish for
>this
>>> year?
>>
>> The plan is to publish Tuesday morning.    We could do UCR as it is
>now,
>> and revise it when the PERs go to REC in ~6 weeks, or just do UCR
>then.
>>
>>         -- Sandro
>
>Let's do UCR as it is now. We may not even need to revise it in 6
>weeks.

Its a bit late - the documents are supposed to be ready in advance, so I already turned them in,  and now the webmaster would have to process them again.     Hmmm.

I can try.   Other opinions?   Has anyone else looked at the changes?  Can you now?

     - Sandro

>
>Thanks,
>Leora
>>
>>
>>
>>> Leora
>>>
>>> On Sun, December 9, 2012 6:42 pm, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>>> Is UCR ready to publish?    Will it be in a few weeks?   There were
>>>> edits done in 2010 that never got published; it's unclear to me if
>they
>>>> ever got reviewed, etc.
>>>>
>>>>          -- Sandro
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 11:31:50 UTC