Re: bug in syntax of rif:List

Ok, the test repository has been updated to reflect the new schemas, and the
new and renamed test cases.

Stella


On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Stella,
>
> The schemas have been updated, can you let us know when this is checked in?
>
> -Chris
>
> Stella Mitchell wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Hm, I remember us as having decided in a telecon to proceed with option
>>> 2.  Perhaps my memory is faulty, but if no one objects, I think we can
>>> proceed as if my memory were correct.
>>>
>>> Stella, will it be hard to update the PS->XML code to do this?
>>>
>>>
>> I made this change, but guess I should wait until the schemas are
>> updated before checking the new xml versions of the test cases into the
>> repository. It won't be hard to make another update if the details of the
>> decision change.
>>
>> Stella
>>
>>
>>
>>  -- Sandro
>>>
>>> We had an email discussion about that bug in the syntax of rif:List
>>>>
>>> (no=20
>>>
>>>> IRIMETA) [1], but we never discussed it at a telecon, nor did we make
>>>>
>>> a=20
>>>
>>>> decision on how to correct it or acted to actually correct it.
>>>>
>>>> There were two proposed corrections:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Just add the missing IRIMETA in the XML schema, changing it to
>>>>
>>> (change=20
>>>
>>>> GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):
>>>>  <xs:element name=3D"List">
>>>>   <xs:complexType>
>>>>     <xs:sequence>
>>>>       <xs:group ref=3D"IRIMETA" minOccurs=3D"0" maxOccurs=3D"1"/>
>>>>       <xs:group ref=3D"GROUNDTERM" minOccurs=3D"0"
>>>>
>>> maxOccurs=3D"unbounded"=
>>>
>>>> />
>>>>     </xs:sequence>
>>>>   </xs:complexType>
>>>>  </xs:element>=20
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. Take the opportunity and align the syntax of <List> with that of
>>>>
>>> Atom=20
>>>
>>>> and Expr, adding an <items ordered=3D"yes"> role element, and changing
>>>>
>>> the =
>>>
>>>> schema to the same effect as (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):
>>>>  <xs:element name=3D"List">
>>>>   <xs:complexType>
>>>>     <xs:sequence>
>>>>       <xs:group ref=3D"IRIMETA" minOccurs=3D"0" maxOccurs=3D"1"/>
>>>>       <xs:element name=3D"items">
>>>>         <xs:complexType>
>>>>           <xs:sequence>
>>>>             <xs:group ref=3D"GROUNDTERM" minOccurs=3D"0"=20
>>>> maxOccurs=3D"unbounded"/>
>>>>           </xs:sequence>
>>>>           <xs:attribute name=3D"ordered" type=3D"xs:string"
>>>>
>>> fixed=3D"yes"/>
>>>
>>>>         </xs:complexType>
>>>>       </xs:element>=20
>>>>     </xs:sequence>
>>>>   </xs:complexType>
>>>>  </xs:element>=20
>>>>
>>>> Harold and Sandro stated their preference for solution 2.=20
>>>>
>>>> Shall we decide to go by it, and change Core, BLD and PRD accordingly?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0028.html=20
>>>
>>>> and following thread
>>>>
>>>> PS: Just in case you check the schema in PRD, and wonder why it has=20
>>>> solution 1: I noticed the absence of IRIMETA sometimes ago when doing=20
>>>> tests with our implementation, and I made myself a note to correct
>>>>
>>> that.=20
>>>
>>>> It is only after I made the correction in PRD, today, and I checked
>>>>
>>> that=20
>>>
>>>> it was aligned with Core and BLD, that I remembered that no decision
>>>>
>>> had=20
>>>
>>>> been made wrt the above discussion.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> IBM
>>>> 9 rue de Verdun
>>>> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
>>>> Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
>>>> Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> Compagnie IBM France
>>>> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
>>>> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
>>>> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
>>>> Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 ?
>>>> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --=_alternative 005A7720C125770C_=
>>>> Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
>>>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Sandro, Harold, all,</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">We had an email discussion about
>>>>
>>> that
>>>
>>>> bug in the syntax of rif:List (no IRIMETA) [1], but we never discussed
>>>> it at a telecon, nor did we make a decision on how to correct it or
>>>> acted
>>>> to actually correct it.</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">There were two proposed
>>>>
>>> corrections:=
>>>
>>>> </font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1. Just add the missing IRIMETA
>>>> in
>>>>
>>> t=
>>>
>>>> he
>>>> XML schema, changing it to (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for
>>>>
>>> BLD):</fon=
>>>
>>>> t>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp;&lt;xs:element
>>>>
>>> name=3D&quot;List&quot;&gt;<br>
>>>
>>>>  &nbsp; &lt;xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;IRIMETA&quot;
>>>>
>>> minOccurs=3D&q=
>>>
>>>> uot;0&quot;
>>>> maxOccurs=3D&quot;1&quot;/&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;GROUNDTERM&quot;
>>>>
>>> minOccurs=
>>>
>>>> =3D&quot;0&quot;
>>>> maxOccurs=3D&quot;unbounded&quot;/&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>>>>  &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">2. Take the opportunity and align
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>> syntax of &lt;List&gt; with that of Atom and Expr, adding an &lt;items
>>>> ordered=3D&quot;yes&quot;&gt; role element, and changing the schema to
>>>>
>>> the
>>>
>>>> same effect as (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):</font>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp;&lt;xs:element
>>>>
>>> name=3D&quot;List&quot;&gt;<br>
>>>
>>>>  &nbsp; &lt;xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;IRIMETA&quot;
>>>>
>>> minOccurs=3D&q=
>>>
>>>> uot;0&quot;
>>>> maxOccurs=3D&quot;1&quot;/&gt;</font></tt>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;xs:element
>>>>
>>> name=3D&qu=
>>>
>>>> ot;items&quot;&gt;</font></tt>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>>>
>>> &nbsp;&lt;xs:complexType=
>>>
>>>> &gt;</font></tt>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;
>>>>
>>> &nbsp;&lt;xs:sequ=
>>>
>>>> ence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group
>>>>
>>> ref=3D&quot;GROUNDT=
>>>
>>>> ERM&quot;
>>>> minOccurs=3D&quot;0&quot; maxOccurs=3D&quot;unbounded&quot;/&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:attribute
>>>>
>>> name=3D&quot;ordered&q=
>>>
>>>> uot;
>>>> type=3D&quot;xs:string&quot; fixed=3D&quot;yes&quot;/&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
>>>> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>>>>  &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>>>>  &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Harold and Sandro stated their
>>>>
>>> prefe=
>>>
>>>> rence
>>>> for solution 2. </font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Shall we decide to go by it, and
>>>>
>>> cha=
>>>
>>>> nge
>>>> Core, BLD and PRD accordingly?</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Cheers,</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Christian</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[1] </font><a href=3D"
>>>>
>>> http://lists.w=
>>>
>>>> 3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0028.html"><font size=3D2
>>>>
>>> face=
>>>
>>>> =3D"sans-serif">
>>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0=
>>>
>>>> 028.html</font></a><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">
>>>> and following thread</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">PS: Just in case you check the
>>>>
>>> schema
>>>
>>>> in PRD, and wonder why it has solution 1: I noticed the absence of
>>>>
>>> IRIMETA
>>>
>>>> sometimes ago when doing tests with our implementation, and I made
>>>> myself
>>>> a note to correct that. It is only after I made the correction in PRD,
>>>> today, and I checked that it was aligned with Core and BLD, that I
>>>>
>>> remember=
>>>
>>>> ed
>>>> that no decision had been made wrt the above discussion.</font>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">IBM<br>
>>>> 9 rue de Verdun<br>
>>>> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE<br>
>>>> Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00<br>
>>>> Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
>>>> Compagnie IBM France<br>
>>>> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex<br>
>>>> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465<br>
>>>> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.<br>
>>>> Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 &#8364;<br>
>>>> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644<br>
>>>> <br>
>>>> </font>
>>>> --=_alternative 005A7720C125770C_=--
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
> +1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
> cawelty@gmail.com                           Hawthorne, NY 10532
> http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty

Received on Monday, 17 May 2010 02:15:47 UTC