W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2010

Re: DTB implementation

From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:42:36 -0400
Message-ID: <4B9E718C.4000009@gmail.com>
To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Update: It appears EYE from Agfa has support for the casting functions here, so we are down to needing 1 more implementation of these predicates:

#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-boolean( ?arg1 ) )
#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-PlainLiteral ( ?arg1 ) )
#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-XMLLiteral ( ?arg1 ) )
#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-not-boolean( ?arg1 ) )
#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-not-PlainLiteral ( ?arg1 ) )
#  ( ?arg1; pred:is-literal-not-XMLLiteral ( ?arg1 ) )


Has anyone implemented them?

-Chris

Chris Welty wrote:
> 
> RIFWG - according to our exit criteria, we need two implementations of 
> every builtin.  At the moment, the picture looks like this, as far as we 
> can tell: we have two implementations of all builtins except the casting 
> and guard predicates for rdf:XMLiteral, rdf:PlainLiteral, and xs:Boolean.
> 
> Does anyone have an implementation of these three sets of predicates?
> 
> Here's the implementations we considered:
> STII - complete DTB implementation
> CTIC - all datatype builtins except guards and casting functions
> Oracle - all datetime, lists, numerics, and string builtins
> 
> -Chris
> 

-- 
Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@gmail.com                           Hawthorne, NY 10532
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty 
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 17:43:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 15 March 2010 17:43:50 GMT