W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2010

Re: RIF FAQ

From: Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:58:02 -0700
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: kifer@cs.stonybrook.edu, public-rif-wg <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF40BA697E.3FD0E7A6-ON8825774C.0051BA51-8825774C.0052356E@fr.ibm.com>
sandro@w3.org wrote on 24/06/2010 06:43:24:
> > 
> > RIF specification itself employes a presentation syntax, which is 
> normative and
> > is used in definitions and examples. However, it is ''not'' 
recommended for
> > exchange among different rule systems.
> 
> But that's not true, is it?   BLD and PRD use different presentation
> syntaxes, don't they?  (At least, PRD uses "if" and "then" while BLD
> uses ":-".)

And the PS is not normative: only the XML syntax is. All three specs 
(Core, BLD and PRD) are explicit about that.

Christian

IBM
9 rue de Verdun
94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10

Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 ?
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2010 14:58:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 24 June 2010 14:58:42 GMT