Re: [XML-Data] review of current draft

csma wrote on 15/06/2010 22:32:20:
> 
> > 11- as discussed (privately), all element information items in an
> > instance of the data model are meant to be distinct. This must be
> > mentioned in the definition. 
> 
> [...] 
> 
> I will add (see 17, below), that everything else is unchanged, when 
> replacing RIF Core/BLD semantic structures with RIF Core/BLD+XML 
> data combined intepretations in the definitions. Is that ok? 

The last paragraph, above, was meant to be included in my reply to remark 
16, below...

> > 16- a RIF document is interpreted using a semantic multi-structure,
> > not a semantic structure. This needs to be taken into account in the
> > definitions in section 4. 
> 
> The spec says explicitly that, apart from the additional constraints
> in the definition of a semantic structure, the semantics of RIF 
> Core/BLD+XML data combinations is exactly unchanged from the 
> semantics of RIF Core/BLD. 
> 
> Is not that sufficient? Or do you think there are also differences 
> in the handling of multi-structures? I did not check, to say the truth 
:-( 
> 
> I will, but I am not sure that I do anything in time for a 
> publication on June 22: if changes need be made, can we do with an 
> editor's note for that round? 

Sorry about the confusion: I should not have reread and modified my reply 
at this time of night, after diner and a bottle of wine :-)

Cheers,

Christian


IBM
9 rue de Verdun
94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10


Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 ?
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644