Re: bug in syntax of rif:List

Hm, I remember us as having decided in a telecon to proceed with option
2.  Perhaps my memory is faulty, but if no one objects, I think we can
proceed as if my memory were correct.

Stella, will it be hard to update the PS->XML code to do this?

  -- Sandro

> We had an email discussion about that bug in the syntax of rif:List (no=20
> IRIMETA) [1], but we never discussed it at a telecon, nor did we make a=20
> decision on how to correct it or acted to actually correct it.
> 
> There were two proposed corrections:
> 
> 1. Just add the missing IRIMETA in the XML schema, changing it to (change=20
> GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):
>  <xs:element name=3D"List">
>    <xs:complexType>
>      <xs:sequence>
>        <xs:group ref=3D"IRIMETA" minOccurs=3D"0" maxOccurs=3D"1"/>
>        <xs:group ref=3D"GROUNDTERM" minOccurs=3D"0" maxOccurs=3D"unbounded"=
> />
>      </xs:sequence>
>    </xs:complexType>
>  </xs:element>=20
> 
> 2. Take the opportunity and align the syntax of <List> with that of Atom=20
> and Expr, adding an <items ordered=3D"yes"> role element, and changing the =
> 
> schema to the same effect as (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):
>  <xs:element name=3D"List">
>    <xs:complexType>
>      <xs:sequence>
>        <xs:group ref=3D"IRIMETA" minOccurs=3D"0" maxOccurs=3D"1"/>
>        <xs:element name=3D"items">
>          <xs:complexType>
>            <xs:sequence>
>              <xs:group ref=3D"GROUNDTERM" minOccurs=3D"0"=20
> maxOccurs=3D"unbounded"/>
>            </xs:sequence>
>            <xs:attribute name=3D"ordered" type=3D"xs:string" fixed=3D"yes"/>
>          </xs:complexType>
>        </xs:element>=20
>      </xs:sequence>
>    </xs:complexType>
>  </xs:element>=20
> 
> Harold and Sandro stated their preference for solution 2.=20
> 
> Shall we decide to go by it, and change Core, BLD and PRD accordingly?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christian
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0028.html=20
> and following thread
> 
> PS: Just in case you check the schema in PRD, and wonder why it has=20
> solution 1: I noticed the absence of IRIMETA sometimes ago when doing=20
> tests with our implementation, and I made myself a note to correct that.=20
> It is only after I made the correction in PRD, today, and I checked that=20
> it was aligned with Core and BLD, that I remembered that no decision had=20
> been made wrt the above discussion.
> 
> IBM
> 9 rue de Verdun
> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
> Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
> Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10
> 
> 
> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
> Compagnie IBM France
> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
> Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 ?
> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644
> 
> 
> --=_alternative 005A7720C125770C_=
> Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> 
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Sandro, Harold, all,</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">We had an email discussion about that
> bug in the syntax of rif:List (no IRIMETA) [1], but we never discussed
> it at a telecon, nor did we make a decision on how to correct it or acted
> to actually correct it.</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">There were two proposed corrections:=
> </font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1. Just add the missing IRIMETA in t=
> he
> XML schema, changing it to (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):</fon=
> t>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp;&lt;xs:element name=3D&quot;List&quot;&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &lt;xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;IRIMETA&quot; minOccurs=3D&q=
> uot;0&quot;
> maxOccurs=3D&quot;1&quot;/&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;GROUNDTERM&quot; minOccurs=
> =3D&quot;0&quot;
> maxOccurs=3D&quot;unbounded&quot;/&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>  &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">2. Take the opportunity and align the
> syntax of &lt;List&gt; with that of Atom and Expr, adding an &lt;items
> ordered=3D&quot;yes&quot;&gt; role element, and changing the schema to the
> same effect as (change GROUNDTERM to LISTELEMENT for BLD):</font>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp;&lt;xs:element name=3D&quot;List&quot;&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &lt;xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;IRIMETA&quot; minOccurs=3D&q=
> uot;0&quot;
> maxOccurs=3D&quot;1&quot;/&gt;</font></tt>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;xs:element name=3D&qu=
> ot;items&quot;&gt;</font></tt>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;xs:complexType=
> &gt;</font></tt>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;xs:sequ=
> ence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:group ref=3D&quot;GROUNDT=
> ERM&quot;
> minOccurs=3D&quot;0&quot; maxOccurs=3D&quot;unbounded&quot;/&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;xs:attribute name=3D&quot;ordered&q=
> uot;
> type=3D&quot;xs:string&quot; fixed=3D&quot;yes&quot;/&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
> <br><tt><font size=3D3>&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;&lt;/xs:sequence&gt;<br>
>  &nbsp; &lt;/xs:complexType&gt;<br>
>  &lt;/xs:element&gt; </font></tt>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Harold and Sandro stated their prefe=
> rence
> for solution 2. </font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Shall we decide to go by it, and cha=
> nge
> Core, BLD and PRD accordingly?</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Cheers,</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Christian</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[1] </font><a href=3D"http://lists.w=
> 3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0028.html"><font size=3D2 face=
> =3D"sans-serif">http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2010Jan/0=
> 028.html</font></a><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">
> and following thread</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">PS: Just in case you check the schema
> in PRD, and wonder why it has solution 1: I noticed the absence of IRIMETA
> sometimes ago when doing tests with our implementation, and I made myself
> a note to correct that. It is only after I made the correction in PRD,
> today, and I checked that it was aligned with Core and BLD, that I remember=
> ed
> that no decision had been made wrt the above discussion.</font>
> <br>
> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">IBM<br>
> 9 rue de Verdun<br>
> 94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE<br>
> Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00<br>
> Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10<br>
> <br>
> <br>
> Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:<br>
> Compagnie IBM France<br>
> Siege Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex<br>
> RCS Nanterre 552 118 465<br>
> Forme Sociale : S.A.S.<br>
> Capital Social : 611.451.766,20 &#8364;<br>
> SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644<br>
> <br>
> </font>
> --=_alternative 005A7720C125770C_=--
> 

Received on Friday, 23 April 2010 13:58:18 UTC