W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2009

ACTION-920 completed

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 01:53:07 +0100
Message-Id: <EB036D74-F23E-4EB3-AF2C-79725FAF04AA@deri.org>
To: "RIF (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=DTB&diff=11060&oldid=11006

I went through the list predicates and functions and adapted them as  
follows:

* I added formal mappings where this was possible more or less  
straightforwardly in my opinion;
   I agree with Sandro that it doesn't make sense to add a formal  
mapping for the last 4 functions
   (union, distinct-values, intersection, except) but I checked these  
informal mappings again and am
   fine with them. I left the informal explanations as well, just to  
remain (hopefully) least intrusive.

* I changed the examples to presentation syntax, since I wouldn't be  
to happy an undefined
   syntax in the examples; even if PS isn't normative, it is  
sufficiently specified.

* I did some more editorial edits, like rewordigns in Section 4.11.1  
and 4.11.2, which I'd appreciate to be checked.

* From my point of view, this is all fine now, except one open issue  
noted with an editor's note in Section 4.11.4.4:
   It seems that the behavior of func:sublist for ?stop before ?start  
is not specifier.

* BTW: Sorry about my forgetfulness, but did we decide on dropping the  
Editor's note on rdf:PlainLiteral (Section 4.10) already?


Apart from the last two points, DTB should be ready to go, hope I  
didn't forget anything more.

Axel



-- 
Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland,  
Galway
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 00:53:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 21 September 2009 00:53:48 GMT