Re: [OWL compatibility] #, ## in OWL compatibility

So returning to the point, you would need to restrict the # relation in RIF/OWL 
combinations further than they are in RIF/RDFS, and that's all?  What's the 
restriction?

-Chris

Michael Kifer wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:01:51 +0200
> Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote:
> 
>>>>>> Also, doesn't 
>>>>>> BLD allow the range and domain of # to be much larger than OWL-DL does for type?  
>>>>> That has already been taken care of by the restrictions imposed by RIF/OWL-DL
>>>>> combo.  
>>>> Such restrictions are currently not there, but they could be added.
>>> My understanding is that the restrictions are there
>>> for ...[rdfs:subclassOf->...] and we simply need to re-use them for ##.
>> Well, not for subclassof (this plays no role in RIF-OWL DL
>> compatibility), but it is there for rdf:type.
> 
> yes. I keep sliding into that rdfs:subclassOf heresy :-)
> 

-- 
Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@gmail.com                           Hawthorne, NY 10532
http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty