W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: [OWL compatibility] #, ## in OWL compatibility

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:11:56 -0400
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Cc: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090910141156.6146ec32@kiferserv>


On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:01:51 +0200
Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote:

> >>>> Also, doesn't 
> >>>> BLD allow the range and domain of # to be much larger than OWL-DL does for type?  
> >>> That has already been taken care of by the restrictions imposed by RIF/OWL-DL
> >>> combo.  
> >> Such restrictions are currently not there, but they could be added.
> > 
> > My understanding is that the restrictions are there
> > for ...[rdfs:subclassOf->...] and we simply need to re-use them for ##.
> 
> Well, not for subclassof (this plays no role in RIF-OWL DL
> compatibility), but it is there for rdf:type.

yes. I keep sliding into that rdfs:subclassOf heresy :-)
Received on Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:12:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 September 2009 18:12:44 GMT