Re: [OWL compatibility] #, ## in OWL compatibility

On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:46:01 +0200
Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it> wrote:

> >> Also, doesn't 
> >> BLD allow the range and domain of # to be much larger than OWL-DL does for type?  
> > 
> > That has already been taken care of by the restrictions imposed by RIF/OWL-DL
> > combo.  
> 
> Such restrictions are currently not there, but they could be added.

My understanding is that the restrictions are there
for ...[rdfs:subclassOf->...] and we simply need to re-use them for ##.


michael