W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: rif owlrl

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:08:04 +0100
Message-ID: <4AA68F74.8060404@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> Shall we try to publish a WD of OWLRL in the next round?  We're aiming
>> for Sept 17, with publication decisions on the non-rec-track documents
>> at the meeting on the 15th.
> 
> It sounds like a good idea, though I may not be able to make the call on 
> the 15th.
> 
>> I just added an abstract, just so the formatting would work, and I
>> noticed that the intro says OWL RL has some datatypes RIF doesn't
>> support; I think that's old, and section 4.4.1 is correct in saying they
>> are now aligned.
> 
> Thanks. I'll fix the intro and check what else might be outstanding. 
> Probably be able to look at that Tuesday this week.

I've done some basic edits to bring the document into line.

However, the current version still uses pred:isLiteral[Not]OfType which 
was dropped from DTB. This can be worked round but I don't have time to 
do this right now, so instead I've added an Editor's Note. That seems 
sufficient for a working draft.

By the way, I went to check for the resolution which removed those 
predicates again but couldn't find it on our resolutions list. I could 
find the earlier resolution which added them.

Dave
-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 8 September 2009 17:08:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 September 2009 17:08:57 GMT