W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2009

RE: [PRD] Refraction Semantics may be WRONG!

From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:08:22 -0800
Message-ID: <A92210407BA7004199621BE5F0AC5D8B01C02BA8@NA-PA-VBE04.na.tibco.com>
To: "Christian De Sainte Marie" <csma@fr.ibm.com>
Cc: "Changhai Ke" <changhai.ke@fr.ibm.com>, "Gary Hallmark" <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>, <mark.proctor@jboss.com>, "neal Wyse" <neal.wyse@oracle.com>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, <public-rif-wg-request@w3.org>
“So, PRD provides a syntactic way to differentiate between the "loop" and "no-loop" cases, as exemplified by the modify_loop [1] and modify_no-loop [2] test cases: they represent the same rule, where the intended behaviour is to loop [1] or to refract [1]. “

If this is the case then I agree RIF covers both semantics!

 

Thanks for the explanation.

 

Cheers

Paul Vincent 

+1 650 206 2493 / mobile +44 781 493 7229 

 

From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christian De Sainte Marie
Sent: 18 November 2009 19:23
To: Christian De Sainte Marie
Cc: Changhai Ke; Gary Hallmark; mark.proctor@jboss.com; neal Wyse; RIF WG; public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
Subject: Re: [PRD] Refraction Semantics may be WRONG!

 


IBM
9 rue de Verdun
94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10


csma wrote on 18/11/2009 16:43:58:
> 
> I am not sure if I understand where is the problem. 
> 
> [...]
> 
> Or did I miss something? 

And, btw, I really hope that I did not miss anything, and that this is, really, only a misunderstanding, not a pb in the spec. 

I would really really hate to have to redo LC (and to re-open the can of worms :-)... 

Cheers, 

Christian

Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : 17 avenue de l'Europe, 92275 Bois-Colombes Cedex
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 €
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 03644

Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:09:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 18 November 2009 20:09:06 GMT