W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2009

Re: RIF-Core conformance clauses, section 7

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:02:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4A12D813.7060906@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
CC: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Stella Mitchell wrote:
>  In FLD and BLD the terminology "conformant document" was found to be 
> misleading and changed to "admissible document" so the same change 
> should be made to Core for consistency.  (And PRD too?)

I've made the same change to be consistent but I don't especially like it.

These are conformance clauses and we are defining the notion of document 

Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Tuesday, 19 May 2009 16:03:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:56 UTC