Re: ISSUE-80: Meta builtins

Chris Welty wrote:
> 
> Basically we need a pred:literal-not-equal, or at the very least a not= 
> for each datatype.  It seems to make sense to have a pred:literal-equal 
> as well (for symmetry, if nothing else), but what does it do? Is it 
> redundant with RIF's = predicate?  Does it do numeric comparison?  Is it 
> simply lexical?


Why isn't pred:literal-equal not just the boolean completary to pred:literal-not-equal? I mean, don't we have to answer the same question wrt pred:literal-not-equal, whether it does pred:numeric-not-equal or not, etc?

Cheers,

Christian