W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: draft public comment for OWL last call from RIF

From: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:41:52 -0500
Message-ID: <497DD9C0.2020502@gmail.com>
To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

I'm not current on the OWL spec so I don't know exactly what you mean by 
"support" here.  RIF does allow for user-defined datatypes.  The RIF BLD 
conformance clause paramaterizes RIF conformance wrt a set of supported 
datatypes, however RIF does not provide any particular mechanism for defining 
them, I guess we've been assuming users would use xsd for that.


Bijan Parsia wrote:
> Another key point.
> AFAICT, RIF does not support user defined datatypes. OWL does. This is 
> one reason we are more sanguine about adding the additional derived 
> types of xs:string.
> Thus, unless you want to add user defined datatypes (or I'm mistaken 
> about that!) it is futile.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.

Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson Research Center
+1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr.
cawelty@gmail.com                           Hawthorne, NY 10532
Received on Monday, 26 January 2009 15:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:54 UTC