W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2009

Re: draft public comment for OWL last call from RIF

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:37:44 +0000
Message-Id: <8F42FBB1-851B-453D-B0E5-55DA5284FB53@cs.man.ac.uk>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>

On 23 Jan 2009, at 15:28, Chris Welty wrote:

> I see.  All this because I said "ridiculous".

Well, it does seem to be your POV, which is fair enough. I'm still  
unclear whether you mean all datatypes or only XSD datatypes.

>   A poor choice of words, I apologize.  Here:
> Stepping back from RIF and OWL, it would be a shame if they each  
> supported a different set.

All other things being equal, I agree. I rather suspect, alas, that  
not all other things will be equal.

Received on Friday, 23 January 2009 15:34:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:54 UTC