On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:44:17 +0100 Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote: > *PROPOSED:* Change all negative guards to return true only for literals that are not of the type, false for non-literals (closing ISSUE-79 [6]). > *PROPOSED:* add isLiteralOfType and isLiteralNotOfType (based on resolution of issue-79) and remove specific type-named guards (e.g. isInteger, isNotInteger). Proposal 2 seems to obviate proposal 1. Proposal 1 has a problem of naming. If we use names like isNotInteger then semantics in Prop 1 clashes with the mnemonic meaning of such a negative guard. (A more accurate mnemonic would be isLiteralThatIsNotInteger). Proposal 2 does not seem to suffer from that problem. michaelReceived on Tuesday, 6 January 2009 02:59:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:00 GMT