See also: IRC log
<josb> if anyone read the wiki page, we can discuss lists in RIF-RDF combinations
<csma> Closed almost all open issues.
Chris: question to Dave - implementation plans?
Dave: we have been doing some
implementation of Core in support of OWL 2 RL and doing some
write up of that
... whether we extend that to a full Core implementation is under discussion, not defined at the moment
Christian: does that include SWC?
Dave: not the embeddings, just the ability to execute over the triple mappings
Josb: the OWL embedding can be
restricted to the parts of RL that don't have the equality
implications and that restricted part can be embedded in
... will you (Dave) implement that?
Dave: undefined sorry, can't rule in or out at the moment
Csma: Agreed to take Core, DTB, PRD, FLD to Last Call; BLD and SWC as Second Last Call
Csma: make decision to publish on
... so only two weeks buffer time before end of the working group
Csma: developed plan for all the
worked needed for each document, plus reviewers and due date.
See link above.
... if decide to publish on May 12th, can do publication on May 19, allow 4 weeks for comments takes us to mid June
Chris: one month to respond to
comments then move to CR mid July
... two implementations of each spec then move to PR, target 1st October for end of CR
Csma: optimistic schedule,
request 6m extension to cover this period, no F2F during
extension, reduced frequency of telecons
... Also reviewed test cases, accepted some, some to be reworked.
... notes that everyone survived the RIF last supper
<ChrisW> so says christ de Sainte marie
Dave: any significant issues with FLD?
Sandro: discussed what FLD
implementation would mean, would like to see more dialects based
on FLD beyond the existing ones, ideally two independent
... no working group decisions on that yet
Harold: maybe extensions based on FLD external to the working group would count?
Csma: yes, that would be
... the conclusion was to move FLD to last call, then call for implementation. The decision of whether to go all the way to Rec will depend on what implementations there are.
Adrian: fixed test cases completing actions action-787, action-788, action-789, action-790
action-783 done :-)
Action-781 (list test cases) completed. Email sent to list.
Gary: Action-780 done but the result crashed the schema checker.
Harold: quite common, make sure you do a deep reload.
Sandro: there are better validators, check list of implementations on WG page?
Josb: just tried xsv again and this time it passed without errors.
<sandro> Gary, http://www.w3.org/XML/Schema#Tools has a list that's a little too long to be very helpful. :-)
Harold: Action-758, made progress but continued.
Action-748 complete (redundant with 751)
Josb: see email and respond with any comments
Harold: suggestion that we continue to collect outreach efforts for RIF, e.g. publications relating to RIF.
Could have page about RIF related publications.
<scribe> ACTION: Harold start publications page with first entry [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-794 - Start publications page with first entry [on Harold Boley - due 2009-04-28].
<csma> ACTION: harold to start RIF publications page on the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-795 - Start RIF publications page on the wiki [on Harold Boley - due 2009-04-28].
Jos: finished proposal for using
lists with RDF/RIF combinations
... two proposals - decide whether to include at all (in SWC) and if so which variant
Vote on whether to discuss RDF lists now
<ChrisW> -1 havent read it
<sandro> -1 but only because I'm wanting a short meeting
Csma: put on agenda for next week
<scribe> ACTION: csma to put correspondence between RIF and RDF lists on next week's agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2009/04/21-rif-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-796 - Put correspondence between RIF and RDF lists on next week's agenda [on Christian de Sainte Marie - due 2009-04-28].
Move to adjorn