W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > April 2009

Re: [ISSUE-94] Object representation

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 16:37:30 +0200
Message-ID: <012801c9b78e$613852d0$d79b9109@4061L3ACC6D>
To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Cc: <csma@ilog.fr>
Gary,

Gary Hallmark wrote:
>>
>> (b) Modify the Frame construct, so that the multiplicity of an 
>> attribute is indicated
>> explicitly, e.g. adding a "cardinality" attribute to the <slot> element;
>>
>> [...]
>>
> I have a proposal (f).
> I propose that we have some common syntax to denote cardinality 
> constraints on frame slots in Core (and thus also in BLD and PRD). BLD 
> and PRD will give this syntax a semantics (using the above rules) but 
> Core will formally treat the cardinality constraints as comments.


I did not read the thread yet, only had a quick look; but your proposal (f) seems very similar to (b): is the difference that the modification of the frame construct to denote multiplicity would extend to Core and BLD (and not be limited to PRD, as (b) implied)?

Cheers,

Christian
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 14:38:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:34:04 GMT