Dave Reynolds wrote: > I agree with Hassan that IRIs (as opposed to CURIs) should be explicitly > delimited in the PS to simplify parsing. I agree with Dave for agreeing with me! :-) > I also agree with Sandro that the PS parser should not resolve relative > IRIs but pass then in the XML. I agree with Sandro (and Dave) as well. > If you do need an IRI checker/resolver for some reason then Jena > includes an iri.jar which is available as a separate download and is > rather more comprehensive and up to date wrt the IRI specs than the Java > URI code (at least 1.4 code) [*]. > > Dave > > [*] At least according to Jeremy, the author of the IRI package. This is interesting - I'd be interested in having access to it if possible. Thanks. -hak -- Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaciReceived on Wednesday, 24 September 2008 11:36:36 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:54 GMT