W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2008

[PRD] PRD telecon Tuesday 16 September

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:13:36 +0200
Message-ID: <48CF6AB0.7040903@ilog.fr>
To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Foolowing the discussion during the RIF telecon last week [1], the PRD task will hold its first telecon Tuesday 16 September after the RIF telecon. Find the details below (notice that the conference code and the IRC channel are *not* the same as for the plenary RIF telecon).

Everybody is invited to attend, but, of course, the idea of a task force is to increase efficiency with a smaller group and a sharper focus...



[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/att-0094/rif-meeting-miutes-09-09-2008.html

Teleconference W3C RIF WG
Production rules dialect (PRD) task force
16 September 2008

North America and Europe are in the summer time:
1700 UTC, 1000 (West US) 1300 (East US) 1800 (London) 1900 (Paris)

Duration: *60 min* 

*Proposed agenda*
1. Organisation (telecon day/time, etc) (10 mn)
2. Principles, scope and priorities (PRD wrt BLD, XML vs PS, prioritizing issues, timeline) (20 mn)
3. WD2 (30 mn)
  - Perimeter [2] and issues to be resolved
  - Discussion of critical path issues
  - planning and work assignment

*Telecon details*
Zakim bridges: +1.617.761.6200 (US), +33 4 89 06 34 99 (F) or +44.117.370.6152
Conference code: 743773 ("RIFPRD")
IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #rif-prd
Web-based IRC (member-only): [http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc]

Please note that RIF-PRD telecons are for attendance only by RIF Working
Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs. 
[2] For the 2nd public working draft (WD2), I propose (as differences with WD1):
- Model-based semantics of conditions, thus enabling data types and fixed interpretation functions and predicates by reference to DTB [3]
  * Issue: how does this interfere with SWC [4]?
- Add an object/Frame creation construct in the action part,  la Gary [5]
  * Shall we add a construct to declare and bind local variables, such as the Bind construct I suggest in [6]?
  * Btw, what do we do about multi-valued Frame properties VS single-valued object properties?
- Specify object/Frame deletion (e.g. as Retract(frameId))
- Specify a first basic set of conflict resolution strategies (no-repeat, priority,...)
- Add a draft XML Schema
[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/DTB
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/SWC
[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Aug/0069.html
[6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Sep/0089.html
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2008 08:14:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:52 UTC