W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: BLD vs PRD (was: Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign)

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 12:17:32 -0400
To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: Patrick Albert <palbert@ilog.fr>, Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>, Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20080909121732.2d24a093@kiferdesk>

On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:17:02 +0200
Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:

> So leaving my chair's hat aside for a moment, I do not quite understand why
> PRD would be bound to a logical approach for what is specific to the world of
> production rules: PRD is bound to the syntax of BLD where their semantics
> agree; but PRD can do whatever is practical and useful to the PR crowd for
> whatever BLD cannot express.

Patrick's suggestions went well beyond that. He ventured to comment about
frames and proposed syntax that cripples their usefulness for logical dialects.

Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 16:18:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:52 UTC