Argh, of course. That's what comes of writing test cases while jet lagged. Thanks for spotting that. I think I've corrected the test case. Dave Stella Mitchell wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > This test case says "Declaring A to be rdfs:subClassOf C > leads to A ## C since rdfs:subClassOf is a sub property of ##. " > But I thought that ## is a sub-property of rdfs:subClassOf, > and if ## holds, rdfs:subClassOf holds, but not necessarily > the other way around? > > Stella >Received on Sunday, 5 October 2008 14:28:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:55 GMT