Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > > Gary Hallmark wrote: > >> [...] >> >> RS3: >> ex:A(2) >> ex:A(?x) :- ex:A(?y), ?y + 1 = ?x >> >> [...] >> RS3 is unsafe, so if PRD adopts Core safety then RS3 would not be in >> PRD, even though it poses no problems. > > Is RS3 unsafe? Is it because = is meant as pred:numeric-equal? But it > poses no problem from the logic point of view either, right? RS3 is supposed to be safe, ?y occurs in a plain atomic formula. Though looking at the current definition of safeness we don't seem to have covered equals properly. DaveReceived on Tuesday, 25 November 2008 17:33:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:58 GMT