W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2008

RE: Reference vs import <-- RIF Core shortened

From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:02:45 -0800
Message-ID: <A92210407BA7004199621BE5F0AC5D8B1B777D@NA-PA-VBE04.na.tibco.com>
To: "Gary Hallmark" <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>, "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>, "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr>, "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, "Adrian Paschke" <Adrian.Paschke@gmx.de>, "Axel Polleres" <axel.polleres@deri.org>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Gary - are you envisaging that RIF translators will also do object/data
model translation?

I have to say I didn't imagine that would be in scope - ie I assumed
that RIF would assume that the translation of any external
object/data/fact model would be handled by other means. 

Paul Vincent
TIBCO | Business Optimization | Business Rules & CEP
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Hallmark [mailto:gary.hallmark@oracle.com]

> challenge accepted, so below
> 
> Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
> Here's a production rule I'd very much like to write if I'm trying to
> translate between RDF and Java objects:
> 
> if ?o # ?c1 and ?o # ?c2 and not(?c1 = ?c2 or exists( ?c ?o # ?c and
?c
> ## ?c1 and ?c ## ?c2))
> then ConstraintViolation("found an object that cannot have a Java
Object
> Model")
> >
> >
Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 23:03:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:58 GMT