W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > November 2008

Re: Reference vs import <-- RIF Core shortened

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 11:38:39 +0100
Message-ID: <49268FAF.8080903@ilog.fr>
To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
CC: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>, Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>, Patrick Albert <palbert@ilog.fr>, Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Boley, Harold" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, Adrian Paschke <Adrian.Paschke@gmx.de>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Michael Kifer wrote:
> I don't see how Java objects and external schemas relate to allowing # and ##
> in RIF-Core facts.  I would like to see a clarification from you on that issue
> and Gary's view.

I don't see that either: as I have said repeatedly, # and ## facts need not be asserted, if there is an external schema, as far as I understand (but, of course, we need to have a way to import and refer to that external schema).

There is one thing that is not clear to me: does Core want (need, require) # or ## facts? 

Sometimes, you sound like it is a demand from PRD, whereas I was under the impresion that it was a demand from Core...

And, btw, does Core want them in rule heads?

(Sorry, I am much father back on Core than I should :-(


Received on Friday, 21 November 2008 10:40:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:53 UTC