W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: BLD comments

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 17:31:37 +0100
To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Cc: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <24465.1211733097@ubuhebe>


> o Process question: can we have a Last Call spec parts of which are 
> defined by non-Last Call documents? Specifically the definitions of 
> Symbols Spaces (e.g. in 2.1) and Schemas for Externally Defined Terms 
> (e.g. in 2.3) are in documents not currently included in the Last Call set.

I've been thinking about that, and I think for LC it is okay, but it
would not be for CR.

That's because LC is about getting stuff reviewed, and I think DTB and
BLD can be reviewed separately.    (CR is about saying stuff is ready to
implement, and they can't really be implemented separately.)

It is certainly sub-optimal, though.

     -- Sandro
Received on Sunday, 25 May 2008 16:32:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT