W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2008

Re: response on xpath "op" namespace

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 16:05:38 +0200
Message-ID: <4836CF32.5080101@inf.unibz.it>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
At the moment I do not really see a reasonable criterion for making a 
division, so I'm leaning towards just having one namespace.

Best, Jos

Sandro Hawke wrote:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2008May/0061.html
> 
> We should probably brainstorm some more about how many namespaces to use
> for RIF builtins, and if more-than-one, what really motivates the
> division.
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> 

-- 
                          debruijn@inf.unibz.it

Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
   -- George Bernard Shaw


Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 14:06:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT