Re: rif:text / owl:internationalizedString

Sandro Hawke wrote:
> The recommendation from the Semantic Web Coordination Group on this
> matter of a new datatype [1][2] is to proceed with the single, small
> Recommendation.  It's not clear what namespace to use, yet, but
> hopefully it will become clearer soon.   (I'm leaning towards using the
> XML Schema namespace, if that WG will consent.)
> 
> So -- any volunteers, from either RIF or OWL to be an editor of this
> document?  Ideally, I'd like one from each WG, since it's not clear yet
> which WG will formally carry it through the process.  For an example of
> a very short Rec, see [3].
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008May/0060
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-owl-wg/2008May/0021.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/1999/06/REC-xml-stylesheet-19990629/
> 

Can we have some discussion first please?

A not dissimilar design was considered and rejected in a long and 
difficult discussion by RDF Core and we should review their (many) notes.

J

Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 16:35:05 UTC