W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2008

Re: ACTION-430, Move specialization sections to appendices

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:50:51 -0400
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org (RIF WG)
Message-ID: <21854.1206903051@cs.sunysb.edu>


> > At the last telecon I  was tasked to explain why ACTION-430,
> > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/430
> > should be scrapped and the following resolution reconsidered:
> > 
> >     RESOLVED: make "specialization of FLD" sections (of BLD) appendices, leav
> > ing standalone sections in place, and making both standalone and specializati
> > on normative.
> > 
> > 
> > 1. I was surprised to actually see this as a resolution. (I missed it when
> >    reading the minutes).
> >    There was no vote on this proposal -- only a discussion. During the
> >    discussion I only said that I'll think how to best address CSMAs
> >    concerns.
> 
> Looking over the IRC log, I think you may be right that this decision
> was improperly made.  I'm sorry for not catching that at the time.  In
> the future, I'll try to make sure people express their own votes on IRC,
> since that process helps make sure everyone knows a WG decision is being
> made.
> 
> If we're reconsidering it (as seems appropriate to me, but it's the
> chairs' call), my leaning is toward having it in an appendix, but I'm
> fine with this next WD having it however you want and we can look at it
> again after that.
> 
>    -- Sandro

When the new WD comes out, we can look at the revamped document and discuss
how to best structure the next draft.


	--michael  
Received on Sunday, 30 March 2008 18:51:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:47 GMT